SUBJECT:Clearing up V.34 confusion The following is a message from Dale Walsh, U.S. Robotics Vice President of Advanced Development. Please do not reply to this message as I read this ID infrequently, and messages to US Robotics should be addressed to one of the standard ID's : SYSOP SUPPORT SYSOP TECHNCIAL SUPPORT ------------------------------------------------ As a member of the ITU-T Study Group 14, I'd like to clear up some of the confusion about the new V.34 standard. Something unique to V.34 is the amount of cooperation that's happened between vendors. U.S. Robotics, Motorola Codex, AT&T, AT&T Paradyne, Cornel (in Ireland) and perhaps other companies have all done up-front data-pump compatibility testing to ensure that V.34 products are compliant with the standard and interoperate. Rest assured that as other manufacturers develop working prototypes, they will join the list. This is the direction companies are spending their engineering. It doesn't help any of us if our products don't work well together. That's the purpose of V.34 -- to have an international standard for 28.8. A lot of new ideas and technology have been developed in conjunction with the standard, and what we as a committee originally envisioned has changed significantly. There have been some outstanding discoveries and developments made in the process, a few of which were also used in proprietary pre-V.34 modems. But, V.34 has it all: precoding, which compensates for severe amplitude distortions; powerful multidimensional trellis coding; constellation shaping and other innovations that give V.34 a greater immunity to noise; nonlinear coding, which addresses the problem of signal peaks being distorted due to non-linear circuit elements; and line probing, which enables V.34 to quickly examine line conditions and select the best transmission strategy to optimize data transmission. V.34 also uses an channel probing technique that can detect certain unusual non-linear distortion mechanisms present on some phone circuits, especially on international circuits. The modems can then select operational modes that better combat distortion. All 28.8 modems are not created equal. The goal of a modem protocol is not only to have a high top speed, but to spend as much of the time as possible operating at the highest possible speed under changing conditions. The V.34 protocol has advanced procedures for training and for recovery from transient disturbances during training. There are several retrain procedures to insure link integrity under adverse conditions. Rate renegotiation procedures allow rapid switching ranging from 4800 to 28800 bits/s as the channel conditions vary. Additionally, V.34 will be the enabling springboard for a host of new applications -- low bit rate video and audio graphic conferencing are new applications that will capitalize on the increased V.34 bit rate and because it is an international standard. In fact, the overriding benefit of V.34 is that it IS an international standard. Many of U.S. Robotics' corporate customers have been waiting for the V.34 standard to be approved because they know it will be supported by a larger number of vendors than any proprietary protocol. I hope this information is helpful. Please feel free to e-mail me at dwalsh@usr.com with any further questions or concerns. Regards, Dale Walsh Vice President of Advanced Development U.S. Robotics, Inc. Member of ITU-T Study Group 14