<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<!-- This template is for creating an Internet Draft using xml2rfc,
     which is available here: http://xml.resource.org. -->
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd" [
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='rfc2629.xslt' ?>
<!-- used by XSLT processors -->
<!-- For a complete list and description of processing instructions (PIs), 
     please see http://xml.resource.org/authoring/README.html. -->
<!-- Below are generally applicable Processing Instructions (PIs) that most I-Ds might want to use.
     (Here they are set differently than their defaults in xml2rfc v1.32) -->
<?rfc strict="yes" ?>
<!-- give errors regarding ID-nits and DTD validation -->
<!-- control the table of contents (ToC) -->
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<!-- generate a ToC -->
<?rfc tocdepth="4"?>
<!-- the number of levels of subsections in ToC. default: 3 -->
<!-- control references -->
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<!-- use symbolic references tags, i.e, [RFC2119] instead of [1] -->
<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>
<!-- sort the reference entries alphabetically -->
<!-- control vertical white space 
     (using these PIs as follows is recommended by the RFC Editor) -->
<?rfc compact="yes" ?>
<!-- do not start each main section on a new page -->
<?rfc subcompact="no" ?>
<!-- keep one blank line between list items -->
<!-- end of list of popular I-D processing instructions -->


<rfc category="std" docName="draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan-01" ipr="trust200902">
  <!-- category values: std, bcp, info, exp, and historic
     ipr values: full3667, noModification3667, noDerivatives3667
     you can add the attributes updates="NNNN" and obsoletes="NNNN" 
     they will automatically be output with "(if approved)" -->

  <!-- ***** FRONT MATTER ***** -->

  <front>
    <title abbrev="BFD for VXLAN">
    BFD for VXLAN
    </title>

    <!-- add 'role="editor"' below for the editors if appropriate -->
    <!-- Another author who claims to be an editor -->


     <author fullname="Santosh Pallagatti" initials="S." role="editor"
            surname="Pallagatti">
      <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
        <street>Embassy Business Park</street>
        <city>Bangalore</city>
        <region>KA</region>
        <code>560093</code>
        <country>India</country>
        </postal>
        <email>santoshpk@juniper.net</email>
      </address>
    </author>
   
    <author fullname="Basil Saji" initials="B."
            surname="Saji">
      <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
        <street>Embassy Business Park</street>
        <city>Bangalore</city>
        <region>KA</region>
        <code>560093</code>
        <country>India</country>
        </postal>
        <email>sbasil@juniper.net</email>
      </address>
    </author>
	
	<author fullname="Sudarsan Paragiri " initials="S."
            surname="Paragiri">
      <organization>Juniper Networks</organization>
      <address>
        <postal>
        <street> 1194 N. Mathilda Ave.</street>
        <city>Sunnyvale</city>
        <region>California</region>
        <code> 94089-1206</code>
        <country>USA</country>
        </postal>
        <email>sparagiri@juniper.net</email>
      </address>
    </author>
	
	<author fullname="Vengada Prasad Govindan" initials="V."
            surname="Govindan">
      <organization>Cisco</organization>
      <address>
        <email>venggovi@cisco.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
	
	<author fullname="Mallik Mudigonda" initials="M."
            surname="Mudigonda">
      <organization>Cisco</organization>
      <address>
        <email>mmudigon@cisco.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    
	<author fullname="Greg Mirsky" initials="G."
            surname="Mirsky">
      <organization>Ericsson</organization>
      <address>
        <email>gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
	

	
    <date year="2015" />

    <area>Nov3 Working Group</area>
    <workgroup>Internet Engineering Task Force</workgroup>

    <!-- WG name at the upperleft corner of the doc,
    IETF is fine for individual submissions.  
    If this element is not present, the default is "Network Working Group",
    which is used by the RFC Editor as a nod to the history of the IETF. -->

    <keyword>BFD</keyword>
    <keyword>BFD for VXLAN</keyword>

    <!-- Keywords will be incorporated into HTML output
         files in a meta tag but they have no effect on text or nroff
         output. If you submit your draft to the RFC Editor, the
         keywords will be used for the search engine. -->

    <abstract>
        <t>This document describes use of Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) protocol for VXLAN . Comments on this draft should be directed to nvo3@ietf.org, rtg-bfd@ietf.org.</t>

    </abstract>
    
    <note title="Requirements Language">
    <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in <xref target="RFC2119">RFC 2119</xref>.</t>
    </note>
  </front>

  <middle>
    <section title="Introduction" anchor="Intro">
    
    <t>"Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network (VXLAN)" has been defined in <xref target="RFC7348"/> that provides an 
        encapsulation scheme which allows VM's to communicate in data centre network. </t>
        
    <t>VXLAN is typically deployed in data centres on virtualized hosts,
       which may be spread across multiple racks.  The individual racks may
       be parts of a different Layer 3 network or they could be in a single
       Layer 2 network. The VXLAN segments/overlay networks are overlaid on
       top of these Layer 2 or Layer 3 networks.</t>
       
     <t>A VM can communicate with a VM in other host only if they are on same VXLAN.  
        VM's are unaware of VXLAN tunnels as VXLAN tunnel terminates on VTEP (hypervisor/TOR).
        VTEP (hypervisor/TOR) are responsible for encapsulating and decapsulating frames sent from
        VM's. </t>
        
    <t>Since underlay is a L3 network, connectivity check for these tunnels becomes important. 
       BFD as defined in <xref target="RFC5880"/> can be used to monitor the VXLAN tunnels. </t>

    <t> This draft addresses requirements outlined in <xref target="I-D.ashwood-nvo3-operational-requirement"/>.
       Specifically with reference to the OAM model to Figure 3 of <xref target="I-D.ashwood-nvo3-operational-requirement"/>, 
	   this draft outlines proposal to implement the OAM mechanism between the NV Edges using BFD.
  </t>
        
    </section>
    
    <section title="Use cases" anchor="usecase">
    <t>Main use case of BFD for VXLAN is for tunnel connectivity check. There are other use cases such as 
        <list style="empty">
            <t>Layer 2 VM's:
                <list style="empty">
                    <t>Most deployments will have VM's with only L2 capabilities and may not understand L3. 
                        BFD being a L3 protocol can be used for tunnel connectivity check, where BFD will 
                        start and terminate at the NV Edge (VTEPs).</t>
                     <t>It is possible to aggregate the connectivity checks for multiple tenants by running 
                        a BFD session between the VTEPs over VxLAN tunnel. In rest of this document terms 
						NV Edge and VTEP are used interchangeably. </t>
                </list>
                </t>
            
            <t>Fault localization:
                <list style="empty">
                    <t>It is also possible that VM's are L3 aware and can possibly host a BFD session. 
                        In these cases BFD sessions can be established between VM's for connectivity check. In addition a 
                        BFD session can be established between VTEPs for tunnel connectivity check. Having a hierarchical
                        OAM model helps localize faults.</t>
                </list>
            </t>
            
            <t>Service node reachability:
                <list style="empty">
                    <t>Service node is responsible for sending BUM traffic. In case of service node tunnel 
                       terminates at VTEP and it might not even host VM's. If TOR's/Hypervisor wants to 
                       check service node reachability then it would like run BFD session over VXLAN tunnel
                       to service node. </t>
                </list>
            </t>
        </list>
    </t>
    
    
    </section>
    

    <section title="Deployment">
    
    <figure anchor="Fig" align="left"><preamble></preamble><artwork align="left"><![CDATA[                 
   +------------+-------------+
   |        Server 1          |
   |                          |
   | +----+----+  +----+----+ |
   | |VM1-1    |  |VM1-2    | |
   | |VNI 100  |  |VNI 200  | |
   | |         |  |         | |
   | +---------+  +---------+ |
   | Hypervisor VTEP (IP1)    |
   +--------------------------+
                         |
                         |
                         |
                         |   +-------------+
                         |   |   Layer 3   |
                         |---|   Network   |
                             |             |
                             +-------------+
                                 |
                                 |
                                 +-----------+
                                             |
                                             |
                                      +------------+-------------+
                                      |    Hypervisor VTEP (IP2) |
                                      | +----+----+  +----+----+ |
                                      | |VM2-1    |  |VM2-2    | |
                                      | |VNI 100  |  |VNI 200  | |
                                      | |         |  |         | |
                                      | +---------+  +---------+ |
                                      |      Server 2            |
                                      +--------------------------+
                                      
                                      ]]></artwork></figure>
    

    <t><xref target="Fig"/> illustrates a scenario where we have two servers, each of them hosting two VMs. 
       These VTEPs terminate two VXLAN tunnels with VNI number 100 and 200 between them. Separate BFD sessions can be
       established between the VTEPs (IP1 and IP2) for monitoring each of the VXLAN tunnels (VNI 100 and 200).

       No BFD packet intended to Hypervisor VTEP should be forwarded to VM's as VM's may drop this 
       leading to false negative. This method is also applicable VTEP which are either software or physical device. </t>

    </section>

    <section title="BFD Packet Encapsulation">
		<t>VxLAN packet format has been defined in Section 5 of <xref target="RFC7348"/>. The Outer IP/UDP and VXLAN headers MUST
			be encoded by the sender as per <xref target="RFC7348"/>.</t> 
		<t> If VTEP is equipped with GPE header capitalises and decides to use GPE instead of VXLAN then 
		GPE header MUST be encoded as per Section 3.3 of <xref target="I-D.quinn-vxlan-gpe"/>. Next Protocol Field in  
		GPE header MUST be set to IPv4 or IPv6. </t>
		
		<t>Details of how VTEP decides to use VXLAN or GPE header is outside the scope of this document.</t>
	   
	   <t>The BFD packet MUST be carried inside the inner MAC frame of the VxLAN packet. The inner MAC frame carrying the 
	   BFD payload has the following format:
       <list>
		   <t> Ethernet Header: 
			   <list>
				   <t> Destination MAC: This MUST be a well-known MAC [TBD] OR the MAC address of the destination VTEP. The 
				   details of how the destination MAC address is obtained is outside the scope of this document.</t>
				   <t> Source MAC: MAC address of the originating VTEP </t>
			   </list>
		   </t>

		   <t>IP header:
			   <list>
				   <t>Source IP: IP address of the originating VTEP.</t>
				   <t>Destination IP: IP address of the terminating VTEP.</t>
				   <t>TTL: This MUST be set to 1. This is to ensure that the BFD packet is not routed within the L3 underlay network.</t>
				   <t>Note: Inner source and destination IP needs more discussion in WG.</t>
			   </list>
		</t>

       <t> The fields of the UDP header and the BFD control packet are encoded as specified in RFC 5881.</t>

       </list></t>
    
    </section>
    

    <section title="Reception of BFD packet">
        <t>Once a packet is received, VTEP MUST validate the packet as described in Section 4.1 of <xref target="RFC7348"/>. 
          If the Destination MAC of the inner MAC frame matches the well-known MAC or the MAC address of the VTEP the packet
          MUST be processed further. </t>
        <t> The UDP destination port and the TTL of the inner MAC frame  MUST be validated to determine if the received packet
        can be processed by BFD. BFD packet with inner MAC set to VTEP or well-known MAC address MUST not be forwarded to VM's.</t>
        
        <section title="Demux of the BFD packet">
        <t>Demux of IP BFD packet has been defined in Section 3 of <xref target="RFC5881"/>.  
          Since multiple BFD sessions may be running between two VTEPs, there
          needs to be a mechanism for demultiplexing received BFD packets to
          the proper session. The procedure for demultiplexing packets with Your Discriminator = 0  is
          different from <xref target="RFC5880"/>. For such packets, the BFD session is identified
          using the VNID, the source IP and the destination IP of the packet.
           If BFD packet is received with non-zero your discriminator then
           BFD session should be demultiplexed only with your discriminator as the key. </t>
        </section>
    </section>
    
    <section title="Echo BFD">
        <t>Support for echo BFD is outside the scope of this document.</t>
    </section>
   
    <section title="IANA Considerations">
        <t>The well-known MAC to be used for the Destination MAC address of the inner MAC frame needs to be defined </t>
    </section>
    
    <section title="Security Considerations">
        <t>Document recommends setting of inner IP TTL to 1 which could lead to DDoS attack, implementation MUST have 
           throttling in place. Throttling MAY be relaxed for BFD packeted based on port number.</t>
         <t> Other than inner IP TTL set to 1 this specification does not raise any additional security issues
              beyond those of the specifications referred to in the list of normative references.</t>
    </section>
    
	 <section title="Contributors">
<t>
<figure>
<artwork><![CDATA[
Reshad Rahman
rrahman@cisco.com
Cisco]]></artwork>
</figure>
			
</t>
	 </section>
	
    <section title="Acknowledgements">
     <t>Authors would like to thank Jeff Hass of Juniper Networks for his reviews and feedback on this material.</t>
    </section>
    
  </middle>

  <!--  *****BACK MATTER ***** -->

  <back>
    <!-- References split into informative and normative -->

    <references title="Normative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5880"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.5881"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7348"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>
      <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-bfd-seamless-base"?>
	  <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ashwood-nvo3-operational-requirement"?>
	  <?rfc include="reference.I-D.quinn-vxlan-gpe"?>
	  
    </references>
    
  </back>
</rfc>
